Since yours is a widegamut display, it’s expected that you wanted to use it for some kind of color critical work (otherwise you woud have choose other type of display, like a common IPS sRGB or a multimedia P3 with VA). Of course user/owner has the last word about keeping or returning it. I’m not saying that it is not acceptable for color critical work, I’m saying that I would not accept it even for office work. IMHO that means inmediately return for refund. Your report shows extreme severity color cast, specially on right side. $1200 is an expensive widegamut 27″ QHD (an A grade) but the same price in 32″ UHD widegamut means a low cost inexpensive display with almost no quality control. $700 is an expensive 27″ QHD sRGB monitor, but the same price means a low cost inexpensive 27″ QHD widegamut with expected very low quality control. Widegamut displays and big displays are more prone to suffer uniformity issues, specially if they are inexpensive for their size+resolution. Most common sRGB IPS displays with reasonable price are expected to meet this relaxed common-use non-ISO criteria. That does not mean that a 3dC on a corner is good, just means acceptable quality for inexpensive displays not meant for color critical work. Most acceptable quality monitors are under 2dC in most used zones of screen and under 3dC on sides. It’s “expected”.ĭC is related to strong tints in display, like having a green cast in the left and a red/pink cast in the right.
It does not mean that is good, just that is common for inexpensive displays (very common if display is big). All green is expected for an A grade monitor meant for graphic arts professional work.ĭC + brightness % is more like an “user driven” relaxed level of aceptable quality.Ībout -15% brightness drop in corners is very probable in common displays. A PASS/NOT PASS test which is hard to pass for common displays. CCT give you a hint about blue-yellow axis deviation in different places of screen, buy you get no information about the extremely common green-magenta tints across screen.ĭE (“total error”, default test) is linked in Displa圜AL to an ISO validation.
Florian is right, no use for CCT values in an uniformity report.
0 kommentar(er)
